Audits, trainings and guided sprints.
Where everything starts. I map every AI tool in use at your company, the official ones and the free tools, where your data flows, what you pay versus what you use, and which automations are worth building. Everything gets scored with the Noxiom grading system, four areas rated 1 to 5. Visibility and control, data safety, spend efficiency, and leverage.
You get the report, a short AI policy for your team, a 6-month roadmap, and an hour with me to walk through it.
A half-day session built from your own audit. Your team learns how these tools actually work, what should never go into a prompt, how to get good output from the tools you approved, and how to catch AI making mistakes and prevent it. The EU AI Act expects companies whose people work with AI to be trained in using it safely. This training covers all of that while focusing on the AI tools your team will actually use.
One item off your roadmap, one timeboxed sprint of 16 or 32 hours, built together with your team by default. I sit with you through the planning, building and testing, and explain the choices as we go. You get a sprint plan that says what done looks like, daily check-ins, help structuring the documentation, and a short written wrap-up at the end. Your team maintains and understands a tool far longer when they built it themselves. Rather have it built for you? That works too, just never as a black box.
Worth knowing before you compare anyone, me included. Right now "AI audit" gets used for three very different products:
A 30 to 60 minute conversation dressed up as a diagnostic, run to sell you the project that comes after.
Not that it's bad. A good intro call is useful (mine's free too). But an hour of talking isn't an audit, no matter what the invite says.
An implementation agency going through your company looking for things to build, because building is what pays them.
The auditor can walk in with an opinion already formed: commissions on the tools they recommend, or the next project they'd like to build. Not always what your team actually needs, which is why these scans always find opportunities and rarely tell you what to cancel.
There are entire courses teaching people to sell AI audits from a reusable deck and an AI-generated report, priced on confidence.
The other two at least deliver a service at some point. This one exists to get paid. If the findings would fit any company ("don't paste client data into free AI tools"), they aren't findings, just generic advice.
Fixed price and scope. Evidence from three independent sources instead of one conversation. Scores that mean the same thing the next time you audit. A full example report right below this that you can read before paying anything. It can conclude "you're fine." And its main purpose is to help your company and your team, not to sell you the next thing.
I kept seeing companies get AI wrong, in efficiency, in safety, in simply knowing what's in use, and it didn't feel right to sit by and watch. And most people using unapproved AI at work aren't rebelling; their tools aren't enough and they're trying to do their jobs better and faster. Understanding that is where fixing it starts.
Even mine is not perfect. It's not free, it's not instant, and it ends in a plan, not in finished work. The audit is the beginning: I tell you what needs to happen, but if nobody does the work, nothing changes.
Don't take my word for that either. These are fair questions to ask anyone selling you an audit, me included:
Mine runs on three independent sources: an anonymous team survey, your own admin screens, and your actual subscription data. The conversation with you is part of it too, but it's one input among several, not the whole audit.
Mine can, and sometimes it will. An audit that structurally cannot say "do nothing" is a sales document.
My scores come from fixed rules that carry over across every audit I do. The numbers mean the same thing for every company, which is what makes your next re-audit an actual measurement.
I take no vendor commissions, and the plan you get is written to be executable without me. If you want my help with the fixes, great, but the report doesn't need you to say yes.
Read the sample report right below this. It's the exact format you'd receive, so you can judge for yourself whether it fits your company. And if something you'd want to see is missing, tell me and we'll fit it in.
Same two words, very different products. Ask the questions above to anyone. You should know what you are getting before you spend anything.
Below is a complete Noxiom audit report for a fictional agency, Fabula Media. It reads exactly like a real one, right down to a finding that tells them they're already doing something well and a recommendation to not build something they were tempted to. The agency isn't real. The report is exactly what yours would look like.
View the sample reportAI tools, data flows and regulations get complicated fast. What you get from me is the clear version: what's happening, what it means for you, and what to do about it. And if anything is unclear, that's what the walkthrough hour is for.
You don't get a bunch of findings to sort through. The plan that comes with the audit is ordered by importance and impact: what to do this month, what can wait, and which finding each item fixes.
Every company works differently. If there's a tool, a workflow or a concern you want looked at specifically, bring it up in the intake call and we'll see how it fits into the audit.